These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656640)
1. Animal welfare group seeks ban on MAbs from mouse ascites. Lewin DI J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):22-3. PubMed ID: 11656640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review. Brody M HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical issues on the use of animals in the testing of medical implants. Saha PS; Saha S J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1991; 1(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 11645720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Out from under the microscope: a case for laboratory animal rights. Subar LM Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1987; 1987(2):511-46. PubMed ID: 11659079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Of mice and medicine: balancing scientific needs and animal welfare. Iglehart JK Washington Post; 1985 Sep; ():Health Su-15. PubMed ID: 11647799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics and animals. Zak S Atl Mon (1971); 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving standards for laboratory animals. Brown GE Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 May; 130(70):E2453-6. PubMed ID: 11658688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the controversy over transgenic animal patents continues. Hecht EJ Am Univ Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):1023-74. PubMed ID: 11652629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal rights and wrongs. Stryker J Healthscan; 1984; 1(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11658711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Winning through intimidation? Budiansky S US News World Rep; 1987 Aug; 103(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 11653798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. International Primate Protection League v. Institute for Behavioral Research: the standing of animal protection organizations under the Animal Welfare Act. Holton AC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():469-78. PubMed ID: 11645614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158. United States US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fight over animal experiments gains intensity on many fronts. Eckholm E N Y Times Web; 1985 May; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Improved Standards for Laboratory Animals Act: will it ensure that the policy of the Animal Welfare Act becomes a reality? Dukes EF St Louis Univ Law J; 1987; 31(3):519-42. PubMed ID: 11650841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The three Rs in research and education: a long road ahead in the United States. Orlans FB Altern Lab Anim; 1996; 24(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 11660275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Creating a private cause of action against abusive animal research. McDonald KL Univ PA Law Rev; 1986; 134(2):399-432. PubMed ID: 11649857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Animal welfare. Tip-off leads to NIH ban. Beardsley T Nature; 1986 Feb 13-19; 319(6054):524. PubMed ID: 3945336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Animal rights activists say regulations are inhumane. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Sep; 9(9):4-5. PubMed ID: 11652911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Animal care and use committees: history and current policies in the United States. Whitney RA Lab Anim Sci; 1987 Jan; 37(Special Issue):18-21. PubMed ID: 11652350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]