These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656659)
1. Governmental regulation of heart transplantation and the right to privacy. Merriken K; Overcast TD J Contemp Law; 1985; 11(2):481-514. PubMed ID: 11656659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools. McConnell MW Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rationing medical resources: a constitutional, legal, and policy analysis. Blumstein JF Tex Law Rev; 1981 Nov; 59(8):1345-400. PubMed ID: 11650622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Equitable access to biomedical advances: getting beyond the rights impasse. Mariner WK Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):571-603. PubMed ID: 11650430 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Setting limits: a realistic assignment for the Medicare program? Kinney ED St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):631-70. PubMed ID: 11650405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing government's responsibility in rationing public and private medical resources. Blumstein JF Tex Law Rev; 1982 May; 60(5):899-918. PubMed ID: 11650651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The uncertain application of the right of privacy in personal medical decisions: the Laetrile cases. Christensen J Ohio State Law J; 1981; 42(2):523-50. PubMed ID: 11649547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted suicide and reproductive freedom: exploring some connections. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1998; 76(1):15-36. PubMed ID: 11657576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health care choice and the Constitution: reconciling privacy and public health. Patterson EG Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 42(1):1-91. PubMed ID: 11659255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal. Arnow RS Berkeley Womens Law J; 1996; 11():19-48. PubMed ID: 11657484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Allocating medical resources and Medicaid: raising the issues from a psychological jurisprudential perspective. Campbell E; Murphy-Berman V; Berman J UMKC Law Rev; 1992; 60(4):665-715. PubMed ID: 11659951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die. Sunstein CR Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying. Robichaud TD Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Survey of abortion law. Platt JG; O'Malley K Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power. Paul EW; Klassel D Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]