These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656660)

  • 1. Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade.
    Ginsburg RB
    North Carol Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 63(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 11656660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom.
    Copelon R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
    Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
    Pine RN; Law SA
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion.
    Koppelman A
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A divisive issue and a divided court: Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Campbell A
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 1993; 13(4):571-83. PubMed ID: 11656374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion and a nation at war.
    First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause.
    Looper-Friedman SE
    New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
    Dworkin R
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
    Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.