These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656660)

  • 21. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Protecting "pregnant persons": women's equality and reproductive freedom.
    Ellis DA
    Const Law J; 1996; 6():967-77. PubMed ID: 11657887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Constitution and abortion.
    Campbell A
    Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade.
    Barnard D
    Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: procreative choice guaranteed for all women.
    Erca A
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1982; 12(3):691-716. PubMed ID: 11655619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Abortion: round 1.
    Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
    Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate.
    Simmons PD
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Choice rights and abortion: the begetting choice right and state obstacles to choice in light of artificial womb technology.
    Goldstein MA
    South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 51(5):877-921. PubMed ID: 11663901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Logic, law and abortion.
    Degnan M; Pannier R
    Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The constitutional morality of abortion.
    Brownstein A; Dau P
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
    Schmidt CG
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abortion, toleration, and moral uncertainty.
    Strauss DA
    Supreme Court Rev; 1992; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 11659887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation.
    Allen AL
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.