These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656729)

  • 21. When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims.
    Harvey JC; Quinn KP; Johnson SH
    Commonweal; 1990 May; 117(9):286-94. PubMed ID: 11652558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Withdrawal of treatment.
    Tomkin D; McAuley A
    New Law J; 1995 Aug; 145(6708):1234-5. PubMed ID: 11654490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
    Ronzetti TA
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 46(1):149-204. PubMed ID: 11652668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incompetent patient (PVS): withdrawal of feeding (Scotland) -- Law Hospital N.H.S. Trust v. The Lord Advocate.
    Grubb A
    Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(3):300-11. PubMed ID: 11657153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Right-to-die order revoked as patient in coma awakes.
    Verhovek SH
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():B3. PubMed ID: 11646710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
    Stell LK
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mediating life and death decisions.
    Hoffmann DE
    Ariz Law Rev; 1994; 36(4):821-77. PubMed ID: 11656438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chicago opinion of marginal value.
    Parnisari EP
    Health Prog; 1988 Mar; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scottish inquiry vindicates decision not to resuscitate baby.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7099):9. PubMed ID: 11644952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. "Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan.
    Broder AJ; Cranford RE
    Univ Detroit Mercy Law Rev; 1995; 72(4):787-832. PubMed ID: 11654371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
    Feenan D
    J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bland: crossing the Rubicon?
    Finnis JM
    Law Q Rev; 1993 Jul; 109():329-37. PubMed ID: 11652844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. House of Lords on care for dying.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws.
    Peters PG
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die.
    Ellman IM
    Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
    Chrisman JP
    Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
    Richard SM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Persistent vegetative state.
    Great Britain. Official Solicitor for England and Wales
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; No. 122():19-20. PubMed ID: 11654864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Commentary: what is really at stake in Baby K? A response to Ellen Flannery.
    Clayton EW
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 11644715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.