421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656800)
1. Forget Washington: state laws threaten to restrict genetic research, too.
Fox JL
J NIH Res; 1997 Nov; 9(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 11656800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
Stepanuk NA
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. States pass laws to regulate uses of genetic testing.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1997 Oct; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11648071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance.
Davis HR; Mitrius JV
Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical aspects of genetic testing.
Fruchtman CE; Pizzulli FC
Whittier Law Rev; 1998; 20(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 11660804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The new genetic age: do our genes make us disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act?
Dichter MS; Sutor SE
Villanova Law Rev; 1997; 42(2):613-33. PubMed ID: 11657553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic prophecy and genetic privacy.
Annas GJ
Trial; 1996 Jan; 32(1):18-20, 22-25. PubMed ID: 11660605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Adjudicating neurogenetics at the crossroads: privacy, adoption, and the death sentence.
Zweig FM; Walsh JT; Freeman DM
Judges J; 1997; 36(3):52-55, 57-58, 90-93. PubMed ID: 11656824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting our 'family secrets'.
Kahn MJ; Jamison KR; Collins FS
Washington Post; 1997 Jul; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic discrimination, insurability and legislation: a closing of the legal loopholes.
Bornstein RA
J Law Policy; 1996; 4(2):551-610. PubMed ID: 11660776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic fallout: new technologies are changing the legal landscape.
Andrews LB
Trial; 1995 Dec; 31(12):20-23, 25-27. PubMed ID: 11660434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Possible protection for researchers who maintain genetic data records.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Apr; 11(4):6. PubMed ID: 11660233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bill restricts genetic information use.
Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5276):727. PubMed ID: 11644822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Controls on DNA could impact research.
Kaiser J
Science; 1996 Jul; 273(5273):299. PubMed ID: 11644818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Insurers' use of genetic information.
Hall MA
Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11658096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The right to genetic privacy? Are we unlocking the secrets of the human genome only to risk insurance and employment discrimination?
Smith N
Utah Law Rev; 2000; 2000(3):705-58. PubMed ID: 12718305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trenton votes to put strict limits on use of gene tests by insurers.
Preston J
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A1, B6. PubMed ID: 11647271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The DNA hard sell: a gene test may lead to discrimination.
Wadman M
N Y Times Web; 1996 Dec; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An insurance view on genetic testing.
Jaeger AS
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 11652661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dangerous intersections.
Korn D
Issues Sci Technol; 1996; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11654761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
