These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656801)
21. Academy opposes local DNA research rules. Sci Gov Rep; 1977 May; 7(9):8. PubMed ID: 11662382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical evolution: will Homo sapiens become obsolete? Easterbrook G New Repub; 1999 Mar; 220(9):20-5. PubMed ID: 11660613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Arbitrage, bioethics, and cloning: the ABCs of gestating a United Nations Cloning Convention. Isasi RM; Annas GJ Case West Reserve J Int Law; 2003; 35(3):397-414. PubMed ID: 16184672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Whose baby is it anyway? Vines G New Sci; 1986 Jul; 111(1515):26-7. PubMed ID: 11658781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Scientists urge senators not to rush to ban human cloning. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11647189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Experts urge no hasty curbs on cloning. Bruni F N Y Times Web; 1997 Mar; ():B2. PubMed ID: 11647187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe. Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Australia considers human cloning for therapeutic purposes. Tattam A Lancet; 1999 Mar; 353(9158):1076. PubMed ID: 11657269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Human experimentation: the review process in practice. Cowan DH Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Human clones split fertility experts. Miller SK; Vines G New Sci; 1993 Oct; 140(1897):7. PubMed ID: 11659681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Australian call for repeal of restrictive cloning laws. Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6728):552. PubMed ID: 11645152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. What is an embryo? Kiessling AA Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1051-92. PubMed ID: 15868674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cloning Californians? Report of the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning and recent cloning-related legislation. Quintero MS Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 2002 May; 18(2):417-31. PubMed ID: 15212073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Manipulating the genetic code: jurisprudential conundrums. Smith GP Georgetown Law J; 1976 Feb; 64(3):697-733. PubMed ID: 11660899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. An evaluation of human subjects protection at CDC/ATSDR. Santelli J; Ginn E; Speers MA IRB; 2000; 22(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 11883474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Cloning and embryo research in Australia: legalization of destructive embryo research. Ford N Ethics Medics; 2003 Mar; 28(3):2-4. PubMed ID: 16206466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The new genetic age: do our genes make us disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Dichter MS; Sutor SE Villanova Law Rev; 1997; 42(2):613-33. PubMed ID: 11657553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Science academy supports cloning to treat disease. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 2002 Jan; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12159891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]