These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656967)

  • 21. Cuomo seeks genetic data of offenders.
    Raab S
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():27, 34. PubMed ID: 11646946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Giuliani backs DNA testing of newborns for identification.
    Lambert B
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Dec; ():B4. PubMed ID: 11647658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. State v. Olivas.
    Washington. Supreme Court
    Pac Rep Second Ser; 1993 Aug; 856():1076-94. PubMed ID: 12041122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Privacy concerns regarding government use of genetic information.
    Dash JF
    J Biolaw Bus; 1999; 2(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 11658225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Of doctors and detectives.
    Scott G; Marshall MF; Tindall C
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Nov; ():F7. PubMed ID: 12159885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Jones v. Murray.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1992 Apr; 962():302-15. PubMed ID: 11648258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protecting genetic privacy.
    Annas GJ
    Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):43-44, 46. PubMed ID: 11654493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expanding file of DNA riles Britain.
    MacLeod A
    Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 Sep; 92(201):1, 9. PubMed ID: 15586930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DNA data banking: a cautionary tale.
    Scheck B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Jun; 54(6):931-3. PubMed ID: 8198137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Whose choice is it, anyway?
    MacKenzie JP
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11646807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. DNA identification testing: assessing the threat to privacy.
    Burk DL
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1992; 24(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 11656259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genes in black and white.
    New Sci; 1995 Jul; 147(1985):34-7. PubMed ID: 11660086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tissue from aborted fetus is tested in rape case.
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Explaining differential trust of DNA forensic technology: grounded assessment or inexplicable paranoia?
    Duster T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 16789950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expanding databases, declining liberties.
    Simoncelli T; Wallace H
    Genewatch; 2006; 19(1):3-8, 18. PubMed ID: 16789300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implanted birth control device renews debate over forced contraception.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jan; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetic tests: can we afford the answers?
    Zoler ML
    Med World News; 1991 Jan; 32(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 11653931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. DNA fingerprinting: informed consent and the admissibility of evidence.
    Horton G
    Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Aug; 7(1):165-89. PubMed ID: 11659595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An international DNA database: balancing hope, privacy, and scientific error.
    Puri A
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 2001; 24(2):341-80. PubMed ID: 12715819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.