256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657030)
1. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: compelling arguments for reform.
Price DP
Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(3):321-52. PubMed ID: 11657030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.
Macklin A
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to refuse treatment in Quebec.
Morrison D
Health Law Can; 1985; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 11660312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The new Ohio Mental Health Act.
Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ
Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Crazy" until proven innocent? Civil commitment of the mentally ill homeless.
Kaufman MS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1988; 19(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Civil commitment.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1977; 2(1):73-126. PubMed ID: 11664952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is the need for treatment constitutionally acceptable as a basis for civil commitment?
Appelbaum PS
Law Med Health Care; 1984 Sep; 12(4):144-9. PubMed ID: 11644186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
Arrigo BA
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Broadening the statutory criteria for civil commitment: a reply to Durham and La Fond.
Stone A
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1987; 5(2):412-27. PubMed ID: 11659144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The third way in mental health policy: negative rights, positive rights, and the Convention.
Fennell P
J Law Soc; 1999 Mar; 26(1):103-27. PubMed ID: 11660777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
Kanter AS
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of statutory change on the civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Peters R; Miller KS; Schmidt W; Meeter D
Law Hum Behav; 1987 Jun; 11(2):73-99. PubMed ID: 11658913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. United States v. Leatherman.
U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Four alternatives to the guidelines for the psychiatric hospitalization of minors: clinical and legal considerations.
Stone AA; Bonnie R;
Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Jul; 139(7):974-5. PubMed ID: 11643761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethics and involuntary treatment.
Wettstein RM
Adm Ment Health; 1987; 15(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 11658991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
