248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657109)
1. Death with dignity: fifty years of soul-searching.
Connelly RJ
J Relig Health; 1998; 37(3):195-213. PubMed ID: 11657109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Leaving the door ajar: the Supreme Court and assisted suicide.
Urofsky MI
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1998 Mar; 32(2):313-405. PubMed ID: 11657162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
Grant ER; Cleaver CA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The "right to die": a case study in American lawmaking.
Meisel A
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):49-74. PubMed ID: 11654848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initiative 119: What is at stake?
Jonsen AR
Commonweal; 1991 Aug; 118(14 Suppl):466-8. PubMed ID: 11651038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law.
Allsopp ME
Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A matter of life and death.
Goff R
Med Law Rev; 1995; 3(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11656726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. After the US Supreme Court decisions: the politics of assisted suicide and the Church's role.
May WF
Stud Christ Ethics; 1998; 11(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 11657711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
Pratt DA
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia.
Magnusson R
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1996 Dec; 20(4):1108-42. PubMed ID: 11657522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A Dutch treat.
Marker R
Hum Life Rev; 1990; 16(4):7-26. PubMed ID: 11651408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Inevitable" assisted suicide?: don't bet your life.
Smith WJ
Hum Life Rev; 1997; 23(2):61-74. PubMed ID: 11656680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die.
Sunstein CR
Yale Law J; 1997 Jan; 106(4):1123-63. PubMed ID: 11656791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician-assisted lethal injection vs. the plastic bag: will euthanasia legislation ever come? A comparison of standards in the Netherlands and the United States.
Joas UA
Temple Int Comp Law J; 1992; 6(2):365-401. PubMed ID: 11660113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An issue that won't die: Court's ruling on doctor-assisted suicide leaves some basic questions unresolved.
Scott J
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A1, A19. PubMed ID: 11647210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "No-sting" death: the final taboo.
Marker RL
Hum Life Rev; 1991; 17(4):7-29. PubMed ID: 11652622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc
Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative analysis of the right to die in the Netherlands and the United States after Cruzan: reassessing the right of self-determination.
DiCamillo JA
Am Univ J Int Law Policy; 1992; 7(4):807-42. PubMed ID: 12091922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
