These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657122)

  • 1. "For their own good": civil commitment of alcohol and drug-dependent pregnant women.
    Chavkin DF
    S D Law Rev; 1992; 37(2):224-88. PubMed ID: 11657122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compelled hospitalization and treatment during pregnancy: mental health statutes as models for legislation to protect children from prenatal drug and alcohol exposure.
    Wilton JM
    Fam Law Q; 1991; 25(2):149-70. PubMed ID: 11659420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A limited role for the legal system in responding to maternal substance abuse during pregnancy.
    Myers JE
    Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1991; 5(3):747-81. PubMed ID: 11651057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pregnant substance abusers: a problem that won't go away.
    Swenson VJ; Crabbe C
    St Marys Law J; 1994; 25(2):623-73. PubMed ID: 11652732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some therapeutic jurisprudence implications of the outpatient civil commitment of pregnant substance abusers.
    Wexler DB
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 11655024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pregnant women in chains?
    Mathieu D
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 11655026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Civil commitment for substance abuse by pregnant women? A view from the front lines.
    Madden RG
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 11655018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The incivility of mandated drug treatment through civil commitments.
    Strickland RA
    Politics Life Sci; 1996 Mar; 15(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 11655023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies.
    Sangree S
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse.
    Flannery MT
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A delicate condition.
    Andrews LB
    Stud Lawyer; 1985 May; 13(9):30-6. PubMed ID: 11649782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandating treatment for pregnant substance abusers: a compromise.
    Mathieu D
    Politics Life Sci; 1995 Aug; 14(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 11654612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
    Parness JA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Norplant: the new scarlet letter?
    Flannery MT
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The right of the fetus to be born free of drug addiction.
    Levine M
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():45-55. PubMed ID: 11661109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reaffirming a need to reexamine paternal responsibilities to the fetus.
    Losco J; Shublak M
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Aug; 13(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 11654649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minnesota's "crack baby" law: weapon of war or link in a chain?
    Johnson JM
    Law Inequal; 1990 Jul; 8(3):485-531. PubMed ID: 11651347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How far can a state go to protect a fetus? The Rebecca Corneau story and the case for requiring Massachusetts to follow the U.S. Constitution.
    Bower HR
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2001; 31(1):123-54. PubMed ID: 12666688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Respecting liberty and preventing harm: limits of state intervention in prenatal choice.
    Mathieu D
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):19-55. PubMed ID: 11655781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings.
    Moss KL
    Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.