These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657129)
21. Ethics panel recommends a ban on human cloning. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():22. PubMed ID: 11647217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A house divided. Cohen S Washington Post; 1997 Oct; ():12-17, 24-29. PubMed ID: 11647257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Italian scientist investigated after animal cloning experiment. Simini B Lancet; 1999 Oct; 354(9187):1365. PubMed ID: 11657646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Preventing a brave new world: why we should ban human cloning now. Kass LR New Repub; 2001 May; 224(21):30-9. PubMed ID: 11794303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Japan to ban human cloning. Saegusa A Nat Med; 1998 Sep; 4(9):993. PubMed ID: 11645100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Should we fear Dolly? Glassman JK Washington Post; 1997 Feb; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11647141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Did I begin? Johnson M New Sci; 1989 Dec; 124(1694):39-42. PubMed ID: 11655947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Research on animals: values, politics, and regulatory reform. Dresser R South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Jul; 58(5):1147-201. PubMed ID: 11659004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The precautionary principle should be used with caution -- and should be applied to animal experimentation and genetic manipulation, not merely to protection of the environment. Balls M Altern Lab Anim; 1999; 27(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones. Ramsay S Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reflections on the usefulness of embryo cloning. Jones HW Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Sep; 4(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 11645277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cloning animals and human beings. European Parliament Bull Med Ethics; 1997 May; No. 128():10-1. PubMed ID: 11655043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Legal aspects of human and genetic engineering. Rozovsky LE Manit Law J; 1975; 6(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 11662232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Toward a theological construct for the new biology: an analysis of Rahner, Fletcher, and Ramsey. Conte RC J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1995; 11(2):429-55. PubMed ID: 11645300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing harm and justification in animal research: federal policy opens the laboratory door. Dresser R Rutgers Law Rev; 1988; 40(3):723-95. PubMed ID: 11650811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Response to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's consultation document on research and fertility treatment using human ova and ovarian tissue obtained from live women, cadavers or fetuses. Centre For Bioethics and Public Policy (London) Ethics Med; 1995; 11(2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11660189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of immature pancreas as a source of tissue for transplantation in diabetes. Mandel TE Bioeth News; 1985 Oct; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 11658643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. (Com)modifying experience. Altman S South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):293-340. PubMed ID: 11645837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]