202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657143)
1. The doctor-proxy relationship: an untapped resource: introduction.
Post LF; Blustein J; Dubler NN
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11657143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Avoiding family feuds: responding to surrogate demands for life-sustaining interventions.
Alpers A; Lo B
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11657146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Extubating Mrs. K: psychological aspects of surrogate decision making.
Powell T
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 11657147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The legal and functional status of the medical proxy: suggestions for statutory reform.
Sabatino CP
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 11657144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary: anxieties as a legal impediment to the doctor-proxy relationship.
Kapp MB
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 11657145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The doctor-proxy relationship: perception and communication.
Zelenik J; Post LF; Mulvihill M; Jacobs LG; Burton WB; Dubler NN
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11657138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Commentary: narrative views of personal identity and substituted judgment in surrogate decision making.
Kuczewski MG
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 11657140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary: from contract to covenant in advance care planning.
Fins JJ
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11657142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stopping treatment on grounds of futility: a role for institutional policy.
Stell LK
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):481-97. PubMed ID: 11652704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Advance medical directives: policy perspectives and practical experiences.
Weinberg JK; Brod M
J Ethics Law Aging; 1995; 1(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11654484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. AMA issues guidelines on end of life care.
Charatan F
BMJ; 1999 Mar; 318(7185):690. PubMed ID: 10074003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mediating life and death decisions.
Hoffmann DE
Ariz Law Rev; 1994; 36(4):821-77. PubMed ID: 11656438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
White PD
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Negotiating towards death.
Winkelstein P
Shma; 1996 Feb; 26(508):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Encountering diversity: medical ethics and pluralism.
Fins JJ
J Relig Health; 1994; 33(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 11659797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A time to live, a time to die: advance directives and living wills.
Mitchell CB; Whitehead MK
Ethics Med; 1993; 9(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 11652738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in pediatric life-threatening illness: dilemmas of consent, assent, and communication.
Kunin H
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 11654857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of power in medical decision-making: an argument for physician autonomy.
Koch KA; Meyers BW; Sandroni S
Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 11651553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a DNR order over family objections: the case of Gilgunn v. MGH.
Paris JJ; Cassem EH; Dec GW; Reardon FE
J Intensive Care Med; 1999; 14(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 11657848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
