158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657144)
1. The legal and functional status of the medical proxy: suggestions for statutory reform.
Sabatino CP
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):52-68. PubMed ID: 11657144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
Addlestone SI
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The "right to die": a case study in American lawmaking.
Meisel A
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):49-74. PubMed ID: 11654848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary: anxieties as a legal impediment to the doctor-proxy relationship.
Kapp MB
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 11657145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Death in the legislature: inventing legal tools for autonomy.
Sabatino CP
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):309-39. PubMed ID: 11652237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity: New Jersey's new legislation.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1992; 44(2):335-403. PubMed ID: 11651452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills.
Johnson SH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990.
Paris JJ; O'Connell KJ
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 11652594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary: narrative views of personal identity and substituted judgment in surrogate decision making.
Kuczewski MG
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 11657140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The health care proxy: ethical and policy choices in New York State.
Mackler AL
APA Newsl Philos Med; 1991; 90(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 12083102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The moral underpinning of the proxy-provider relationship: issues of trust and distrust.
Collopy BJ
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 11657141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The doctor-proxy relationship: an untapped resource: introduction.
Post LF; Blustein J; Dubler NN
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11657143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding family feuds: responding to surrogate demands for life-sustaining interventions.
Alpers A; Lo B
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11657146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The living will.
Ifrah AJ
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1992; No. 24():121-52. PubMed ID: 11652621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Appointing an agent to make medical treatment choices.
Fowler M
Columbia Law Rev; 1984 May; 84(4):985-1031. PubMed ID: 11649964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death.
Kutner L
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1987; 64(4):661-86. PubMed ID: 11652520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Commentary: from contract to covenant in advance care planning.
Fins JJ
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 11657142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute.
Lieberson A
Conn Probate Law J; 1992; 7(1):49-113. PubMed ID: 11653117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The limitations of legislation.
Orentlicher D
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
