These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657178)

  • 1. Duty to re-contact: a study of families at risk for Fragile X.
    Bernard LE; McGillivray B; Van Allen MI; Friedman JM; Langlois S
    J Genet Couns; 1999 Feb; 8(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 11657178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fragile case for screening?
    Webb J
    New Sci; 1993 Dec 25-1994 Jan 1; 140(1905-1906):10-1. PubMed ID: 11659746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictive and carrier testing of children: professional dilemmas for clinical geneticists.
    Chapple A; May C; Campion P
    Eur J Genet Soc; 1996; 2(2):28-38. PubMed ID: 11654831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Question mark hangs over fragile X test in newborns.
    Webb J
    New Sci; 1995 Jul; 147(1985):10. PubMed ID: 11660085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-contact to advise of testing available to detect high risk for carcinoma: response to letters sent to persons initially ascertained for other genetic reasons.
    Swiglo BA; Lebel RR
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Oct; 61(4):A390. PubMed ID: 11644970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The duty to re-contact for newly appreciated risk factors: fragile X premutation.
    Guzauskas GF; Lebel RR
    J Clin Ethics; 2006; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16689113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Torts and the double helix: malpractice liability for failure to warn of genetic risks.
    Andrews LB
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):149-84. PubMed ID: 11656665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers.
    Fitzpatrick J; Hahn C; Costa T; Huggins M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Oct; 61(4):A57. PubMed ID: 11644972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staying informed and recontacting patients about research advances: a study of patient attitudes.
    Huggins M; Hahn C; Costa T
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):A335. PubMed ID: 11644832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The duty to recontact: benefit and harm.
    Sharpe NF
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Oct; 65(4):1201-4. PubMed ID: 10486341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diffusion of information about genetic risk within families.
    Ayme S; Macquart-Moulin G; Julian-Reynier C; Chabal F; Giraud F
    Neuromuscul Disord; 1993; 3(5-6):571-4. PubMed ID: 11660032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.
    Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
    Bioethics; 1991 Jul; 5(3):212-32. PubMed ID: 11659340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA dilemmas: readers and 'experts' weigh in on biomedical ethics.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1994 Dec; 146(25):408-10. PubMed ID: 11659895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Duty to re-contact.
    Hirschhorn K; Fleisher LD; Godmilow L; Howell RR; Lebel RR; McCabe ER; McGinniss MJ; Milunsky A; Pelias MZ; Pyeritz RE; Sujansky E; Thompson BH; Zinberg RE
    Genet Med; 1999; 1(4):171-2. PubMed ID: 11258354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic testing of children.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Jun; No. 119():22-3. PubMed ID: 11654573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fragile X omen: scientific advances compel a legislative treatment of wrongful life and wrongful birth.
    Hackett K
    J Law Technol; 1987; 2(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11659197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics of prediction: genetic risk and the physician-patient relationship.
    Juengst ET
    Genome Sci Technol; 1995; 1(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 11660453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indiana clergy: a survey of their human genetics/bioethics educational needs.
    Mertens TR; Hendrix JR; Mendenhall GL
    J Pastoral Care; 1986 Mar; 40(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 11645584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic testing for cancer risk: a population survey on attitudes and intention.
    Ulrich CM; Kristal AR; White E; Hunt JR; Durfy SJ; Potter JD
    Community Genet; 1998; 1(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 11658005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic risk and reproduction.
    Parsons E; Atkinson P
    Sociol Rev; 1993 Nov; 41(4):679-706. PubMed ID: 11659899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.