These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657185)

  • 1. Fatal accident inquiry: death during research.
    Hamilton P
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Aug; No. 130():22-4. PubMed ID: 11657185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
    Delgado R; Leskovac H
    UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent to participate in research.
    Levine RJ
    Bioethics Dig; 1977 Mar; 1(11):1-13. PubMed ID: 11664809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observational research on the electronic superhighway; Problems on the Internet: a lawyer's perspective; The networker's perspective; Bioethics perspective; User's perspective.
    Rosenoer J; Isaacs S; Macklin R; Silverman S
    Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(1):105-18. PubMed ID: 11654167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tamoxifen and informed consent/dissent.
    Raloff J
    Sci News; 1992 Nov; 142(22):378-80. PubMed ID: 11659541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protocol review within the context of a research program.
    Miller FG; Rosenstein DL
    IRB; 1998; 20(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11657088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research ethics in applied anthropology.
    Marshall PA
    IRB; 1992; 14(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 11651463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perspectives of protocol reviewers.
    Moline ML; Aisen MW
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 11653327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IRB intervention in the consent process.
    Robertson JA
    IRB; 1982 May; 4(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent to incomplete disclosure as an alternative to deception: case study.
    Levine RJ
    IRB; 1982 Dec; 4(10):9-11. PubMed ID: 11651795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hyperbaric research at Duke University--ethical considerations.
    Bennett PB; Kylstra JA
    Forsvarsmedicin; 1973; 9(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 11661280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Better safe than sorry.
    Faulder C
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():29-33. PubMed ID: 11651270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research subject loses case against physician, IRB, and hospital.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects -- final reflections.
    Katz J
    Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):277-83. PubMed ID: 11654523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The case of two devices: disclosure to subjects following Phase IV ("post-marketing") research.
    Anderson JR; Jameton A; Reitemeier PJ; Prentice E
    IRB; 1995; 17(3):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. For nonscientists and subjects, consent forms are too technical.
    Daniels RW
    IRB; 1990; 12(4):7. PubMed ID: 11651264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent is binding contract: Dahl v. HEM Pharmaceuticals.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Dec; 10(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11653220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical experimentation: international rules and practice.
    Deutsch E
    Law Rev; 1989 Feb; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11659309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.