These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657241)
1. Third trimester abortion for fetal abnormality. Gevers S Bioethics; 1999 Jul; 13(3-4):306-13. PubMed ID: 11657241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Late termination of pregnancy in cases of severe abnormalities in the fetus. Gevers S Med Law; 1998; 17(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 9646596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal abortion in America: factors in the dynamics of change. Cavanagh D Lib Life Fam; 1996; 2(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11660386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In late abortions, decisions are painful and options few. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1992 Jan; ():1, 16. PubMed ID: 11646882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Termination of pregnancy limit: 28, 24, or 18 weeks. Hewitt J; Coyle PC; Kelly J Lancet; 1988 Jan; 1(8548):186-7. PubMed ID: 11655907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The new law of abortion: clarification or ambiguity? Grubb A Crim Law Rev; 1991 Sep; [1991]():659-70. PubMed ID: 11656129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reform of German abortion law: first experiences. Eser A Am J Comp Law; 1986; 34(2):369-83. PubMed ID: 11655825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade. Rhoden NK Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and public policy. Swomley JM St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):409-25. PubMed ID: 11656617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy. Mayo TW Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion minefield for doctors. Warden J Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Oct; 295(6605):1076. PubMed ID: 11655841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right? Barber RA Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective abortion and the diagnosis of fetal damage: issues and concerns. Cohen LG J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps; 1986; 11(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11655848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate. Bell KL Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany. Neuman GL Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions. Rhoden NK Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]