505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657292)
1. The other right-to-life debate: when does Fourteenth Amendment "life" end?
Linder DO
Ariz Law Rev; 1995; 37(4):1183-207. PubMed ID: 11657292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Lund N
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):903-46. PubMed ID: 11657287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The status of the permanently unconscious: "You call that living?
Gold JA
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1087-98. PubMed ID: 11651436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical issues debates: intervention for infants with fatal heart disease, xenografting, and brain death criteria for anencephalic infants. Debate III. Resolved: brain death criteria must be revised so that society can readily benefit from families who offer their anencephalic infants as organ donors.
Girvin J; Capron AM
J Heart Lung Transplant; 1993; 12(6 pt.2):S369-78. PubMed ID: 11660030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human life amendment.
Helms J
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Jan; 123(4):S436-45. PubMed ID: 11664767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Religious traditions and public policy.
Bleich JD
Assia Jew Med Ethics; 1988 May; 1(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 12083149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The best interests of incompetent patients: the capacity for interpersonal relationships as a standard for decisionmaking.
Quinn KP
Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jul; 76(4):897-937. PubMed ID: 11650115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Personhood: current legal views.
Larson EJ
Second Opin; 1990 Jul; 14():41-53. PubMed ID: 11650425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who counts?
Smith DH
J Relig Ethics; 1984; 12(2):240-55. PubMed ID: 11655717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life.
Prygoski PJ
Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Statutory criteria for determining human death.
Humber JM
Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1069-85. PubMed ID: 11651435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The legacy of Infant Doe.
Cosby MG
Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die at the end of your life.
Belgum D
J Relig Health; 1990; 29(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 11651995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
Destro RA
Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human rights and human life: an uneven fit.
Patterson EG
Tulane Law Rev; 1994 Jun; 68(6):1527-61. PubMed ID: 11656638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Taking the camel by the nose: the anencephalic as a source for pediatric organ transplants.
Friedman JA
Columbia Law Rev; 1990 May; 90(4):917-78. PubMed ID: 11659552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
