505 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657292)
21. Interstate preemption: the right to travel, the right to life, and the right to die.
Brilmayer L
Mich Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 91(5):873-906. PubMed ID: 11656298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Extending the boundaries of life: implications for practice.
Abramson M; Black RB
Health Soc Work; 1985; 10(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 11658746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Legal trends in bioethics.
Davis DS
J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 11645024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Jewish entailments of valuing life.
Bleich JD
Shma; 1990 Nov; 21(401):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1985 developments.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):257-78. PubMed ID: 11651813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis.
Wood AT
St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Euthanasia: a historical overview.
Marker RL; Stanton JR; Recznik ME; Fournier KA
Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11651211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ends and means of life: the Supreme Court and withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.
Feenan D
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(5):152, 151. PubMed ID: 11657627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The right of the dying to refuse life prolonging medical procedures: the evolving importance of state constitutions.
Marks TC; Morgan RC
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1992; 18(3):467-98. PubMed ID: 11654441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Supreme Court and terminal sedation: rejecting assisted suicide, embracing euthanasia.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):947-68. PubMed ID: 11657288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Transition from fetus to infant: a problem for law and ethics.
Jonsen AR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):697-701. PubMed ID: 11655854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion.
Stacy T
Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. On matters of life and death.
McCormick RA
US Cathol; 1982 Mar; 47(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 11655526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
McConnell MW
Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Examining the limits of life.
Angelo B
Time; 1987 Nov; 130(18):76-7. PubMed ID: 11658926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Ethical issues in redefining death.
Penticuff JH
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Feb; 22(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 11652570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality-of-life ethics and constitutional jurisprudence: the demise of natural rights and equal protection for the disabled and incompetent.
Destro RA
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():71-130. PubMed ID: 10317804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
