These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Adjudicating neurogenetics at the crossroads: privacy, adoption, and the death sentence. Zweig FM; Walsh JT; Freeman DM Judges J; 1997; 36(3):52-55, 57-58, 90-93. PubMed ID: 11656824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Possible protection for researchers who maintain genetic data records. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 Apr; 11(4):6. PubMed ID: 11660233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Forget Washington: state laws threaten to restrict genetic research, too. Fox JL J NIH Res; 1997 Nov; 9(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 11656800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Public policy and legal issues raised by advances in genetic screening and testing. Reilly PR Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1327-57. PubMed ID: 11657041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal aspects of genetics, work and insurance in North America and Europe. Rothstein MA; Knoppers BM Eur J Health Law; 1996 Jun; 3(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 11654763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The new genetic age: do our genes make us disabled individuals under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Dichter MS; Sutor SE Villanova Law Rev; 1997; 42(2):613-33. PubMed ID: 11657553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Playing the odds: health insurers want to know what's in your DNA. Hallowell C Time; 1999 Jan; 153(1):60. PubMed ID: 11656966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Accessing genomic information or safeguarding genetic privacy. Smith GP J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 11654453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Genetic testing and screening: the developing European jurisprudence. McGleenan T Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 1999; 5(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11660793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The DNA hard sell: a gene test may lead to discrimination. Wadman M N Y Times Web; 1996 Dec; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Genetic discrimination in the workplace: an overview of existing protections. Kaufmann MB Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1999; 30(3):393-438. PubMed ID: 11658078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Social issues of genome innovation and intellectual property. Draper EA Risk; 1996; 7(3):201-29. PubMed ID: 11655075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bill restricts genetic information use. Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5276):727. PubMed ID: 11644822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The legal regulation of genetic discrimination: old responses to new technology. Epstein RA Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Jan; 74(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11659913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Genetic information and long-term care insurance. Lisko EA Health Law News; 1998 Sep; 12(1):3, 12-13. PubMed ID: 11656859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Executive Order 13145 of February 8, 2000: to prohibit discrimination in federal employment based on genetic information. Clinton WJ Fed Regist; 2000 Feb; 65(28):6877-80. PubMed ID: 11660672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Insurers' use of genetic information. Hall MA Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11658096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. MPs call for tough controls on human genetics. Genethics News; 1995; No. 7():1, 3. PubMed ID: 11655124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]