These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657306)
61. In search of the perfect child: genetic testing and selective abortion. Peters T Christ Century; 1996 Oct; 113(31):1034-7. PubMed ID: 11656621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Clinton would broaden access of the police to medical records. Pear R N Y Times Web; 1997 Sep; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11648062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. The Human Genome Project and the end of insurance. Berry RM Univ Fla J Law Public Policy; 1996; 7(2):205-56. PubMed ID: 11660500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Participation in pedigree studies and the risk of impeded access to health insurance. Kass NE IRB; 1993; 15(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 11659704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Advent of testing for breast cancer genes leads to fears of disclosure and discrimination. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. Privacy and the Human Genome Project. Wiesenthal DL; Wiener NI Ethics Behav; 1996; 6(3):189-202. PubMed ID: 11654975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. HIV-specific crime legislation: targeting an epidemic for criminal prosecution. O'Toole EM J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(1):183-208. PubMed ID: 11655191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Regulating confidentiality of surrogacy records: lessons from the adoption experience. Smith P J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):65-103. PubMed ID: 11656450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Position paper on genetic discrimination Position paper on human genome initiative. Council for Responsible Genetics Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 11650968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Genetic disability: a modest proposal to modify the ADA to protect against some forms of genetic discrimination. Chorpening J North Carol Law Rev; 2004 May; 82(4):1441-81. PubMed ID: 16437812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Whose genetic information is it anyway? A legal analysis of the effects that mapping the human genome will have on privacy rights and genetic discrimination. McLochlin DL John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):609-46. PubMed ID: 16331878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court. Tarr RW Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The ethical implications of the Human Genome Project for the workplace. Brady T Int J Appl Philos; 1995; 10(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 11902192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response. Boyer BB Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Protection of privacy in health care reform. Schwartz PM Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1995 Mar; 48(2):295-347. PubMed ID: 11660428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Genetic privacy and discrimination: a survey of state legislation. Comment. Mulholland WF; Jaeger AS Jurimetrics; 1999; 39(3):317-26. PubMed ID: 11762444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Genetic testing: a comparative view. Knoppers BM Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1993; 8(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 11652662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Genetic testing and discrimination: how private is your information? Slaughter LM Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2006; 17(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 17165231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]