These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657322)

  • 1. The blossoming of bioethics at NIH.
    Emanuel EJ
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Dec; 8(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 11657322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical bioethics at NIH: history and a new vision.
    Fletcher JC
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1995 Dec; 5(4):355-64. PubMed ID: 10153761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The bioethics movement and hospital ethics committees.
    Fletcher JC
    MD Law Rev; 1991; 50(3):859-94. PubMed ID: 11651208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of the Bioethics Program of the National Institutes of Health Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center.
    Bonkovsky FO
    HEC Forum; 1995 Jan; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 10141588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-critical federal science? The ethics experiment within the U.S. Human Genome Project.
    Juengst ET
    Soc Philos Policy; 1996; 13(2):63-95. PubMed ID: 11653300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A pilot project: bioethics consultants as non-voting members of IRBs at the National Institutes of Health.
    DeRenzo EG; Wichman A
    IRB; 1990; 12(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-level ethics committee 'needed to guide genetics policy'.
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):756. PubMed ID: 9039894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward increased public representation on bioethics committees: lessons from judging the Cold War human radiation experiments.
    Szetela C
    Account Res; 1999; 6(3):183-203. PubMed ID: 11658123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testimony before the NIH Human Embryo Research Panel.
    Irving DN
    Linacre Q; 1994 Nov; 61(4):82-9. PubMed ID: 11652834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioethics and public policy: still seeking a forum.
    Hanna KE; Cook-Deegan RM; Nishimi RY
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 11654818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioethics consultants to the National Institutes of Health's intramural IRB system: the continuing evolution.
    DeRenzo EG; Bonkovsky FO
    IRB; 1993; 15(3):9-10. PubMed ID: 11652155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding a forum for bioethics in U.S. public policy.
    Hanna KE; Cook-Deegan RM; Nishimi RY
    Politics Life Sci; 1993 Aug; 12(2):205-19. PubMed ID: 11654723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
    United States
    US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What to do until the philosopher kings come: bioethics and public policy in Canada.
    Miller J
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 11654828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles and pragmatism.
    Charo RA
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1996 Sep; 6(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 11653402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On restoring public bioethics.
    Fletcher JC
    Politics Life Sci; 1994 Feb; 13(1):84-6. PubMed ID: 11654824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NIH forms policy centre to study research ethics.
    Mervis J
    Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6368):367. PubMed ID: 1557111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. IRBs under the microscope.
    Moreno JD
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1998 Sep; 8(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 11656936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US bioethics panel poised to judge local review boards.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Oct; 383(6600):466. PubMed ID: 8849708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical ethicists are a new source of second opinions.
    Malcolm AH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Jul; ():E24. PubMed ID: 11646170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.