These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657348)
1. The "right to die" in America: sloganeering from Quinlan and Cruzan to Quill and Kevorkian. Annas GJ Duquesne Law Rev; 1996; 34(4):875-97. PubMed ID: 11657348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. Kadish SH Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Allsopp ME Humane Med; 1992 Apr; 8(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 11651322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The "right to die": a case study in American lawmaking. Meisel A Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):49-74. PubMed ID: 11654848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live". Kamisar Y Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia. Grant ER; Cleaver CA Md J Contemp Leg Issues; 1991; 2(2):99-256. PubMed ID: 11651215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Ellman IM Jurimetrics; 1989; 29(4):389-401. PubMed ID: 11652559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to death. Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 1991 Jan; ():14-7. PubMed ID: 11653244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. People with pipes: a question of euthanasia. Machler S Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1993; 16(2):781-832. PubMed ID: 11659755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of the Cruzan case on the rights of elderly clients. Gottlich V Clgh Rev; 1990 Nov; 24(7):663-70. PubMed ID: 11652574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients. Robertson JA Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1139-202. PubMed ID: 11652580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surrogate consent. Richards N Public Aff Q; 1992 Apr; 6(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 11652630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1990 Jun; ():A1, A18, A19. PubMed ID: 11646758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s. Johnson SH Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill. Eisenberg KG Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]