229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657385)
1. UK royal college responds to scientific fraud.
Ramsay S
Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8964):1566. PubMed ID: 11657385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lessons from the Pearce affair: handling scientific fraud.
Lock S
BMJ; 1995 Jun; 310(6994):1547-8. PubMed ID: 7787632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Lies, damned lies, and science -- BBC2 Horizon: "The Betrayers," 13 Mar 1995.
Wilmshurst P
BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):747. PubMed ID: 11644676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: is it prejudicial to patient safety?
Wells F
Adverse Drug React Acute Poisoning Rev; 1992; 11(4):241-55. PubMed ID: 11652183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research fraud: discouraging the others.
Lock S
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6765):1348. PubMed ID: 11642809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. GMC finds GPs guilty of fraud.
Dyer O
BMJ; 1994 Apr; 308(6937):1122. PubMed ID: 11644557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. GMC gets tough with fraudulent doctors.
Dillner L
BMJ; 1991 Dec; 303(6816):1493. PubMed ID: 11642956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Call for research misconduct agency.
White C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research.
Wells F
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):25-38. PubMed ID: 11654814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
Swan N
New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud in drug research.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1992 Aug; 340(8817):477-8. PubMed ID: 11643085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
Chantler C; Chantler S
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Nazi data on hypothermia termed unscientific.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1990 May; ():B11. PubMed ID: 11646755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
Kochan CA; Budd JM
J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
