BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657385)

  • 21. Time to face up to research misconduct.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Allegations of dishonesty in research and their treatment by American universities.
    Mazur A
    Minerva; 1989; 27(2-3):177-94. PubMed ID: 11654071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
    Goldbeck-Wood S
    BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
    Jefferson T
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
    Pellegrino ED
    Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationship between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: a report of the Royal College of Physicians.
    Royal College of Physicians
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1986 Oct; 20(4):3-10. PubMed ID: 11643936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consultant struck off over research fraud.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):205. PubMed ID: 11644983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
    Farthing MJ
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
    University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
    Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Research ban on fraudulent doctor.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8836):45. PubMed ID: 11643225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Causes, investigation and prevention. A report of the Royal College of Physicians.
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1991 Apr; 25(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2066936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
    Broad WJ; Wade N
    Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Scientific misconduct: Chinese journals pledge crackdown.
    Wang J
    Science; 1999 Mar; 283(5407):1427. PubMed ID: 11645143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.