148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657408)
1. Testing for HD in twins.
Reich E; Zanko A; Heimler A
J Genet Couns; 1996 Mar; 5(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11657408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Autonomy, respect, and genetic information policy: a reply to Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry.
Rhodes R
J Med Philos; 2000 Feb; 25(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 11645210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic privacy in Washington state: policy considerations and a Model Genetic Privacy Act.
Jensen KA
Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):357-86. PubMed ID: 11660670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Paternalistic and protective?
Hodge SE
J Genet Couns; 1995 Dec; 4(4):351-2. PubMed ID: 11655083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rethinking medical confidentiality: the impact of genetics.
Wachbroit R
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1391-410. PubMed ID: 11657043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In defence of ignorance: genetic information and the right not to know.
Laurie GT
Eur J Health Law; 1999 Jun; 6(2):119-32. PubMed ID: 11657815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Huntington disease: a case study describing the complexities and nuances of predictive testing of monozygotic twins.
Heimler A; Zanko A
J Genet Couns; 1995 Jun; 4(2):125-37. PubMed ID: 11660384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Freedom and a right (not) to know.
Räikkä J
Bioethics; 1998 Jan; 12(1):49-63. PubMed ID: 11655309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.
Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
Bioethics; 1991 Jul; 5(3):212-32. PubMed ID: 11659340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MSJAMA. The dilemma of confidentiality in Huntington disease.
Wusthoff C
JAMA; 2003 Sep; 290(9):1219-20. PubMed ID: 12953009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Structuring the review of human genetics protocols: gene localization and identification studies.
Glass KC; Weijer C; Palmour RM; Shapiro SH; Lemmens TM; Lebacqz K
IRB; 1996; 18(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 11654877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. African-Americans' views on ethical issues in genetics: results of a public survey.
Wertz DC
J Genet Couns; 1998 Dec; 7(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 11660674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Respect for autonomy" in genetic counseling: an analysis and a proposal.
White MT
J Genet Couns; 1997 Sep; 6(3):297-313. PubMed ID: 11655205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. International perspectives on ethics and human genetics.
Wertz DC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1411-56. PubMed ID: 11657044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Publication-related risks to privacy: ethical implications of pedigree studies.
Powers M
IRB; 1993; 15(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 11652150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What would you do?: an investigation into Jewish biomedical ethics.
Kenigsberg K; Reisner AI; Davidowitz-Farkas Z; Fins JJ; Breitowitz YA; Grumet Z; Berkowitz AK
Shma; 1995 Sep; 26(496):1-8. PubMed ID: 11660114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comment on a view favoring ignorance of genetic information: confidentiality, autonomy, beneficence and the right not to know.
Bottis MC
Eur J Health Law; 2000 Jun; 7(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 11789513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should parents be permitted to authorize genetic testing for their children?
Holland J
Fam Law Q; 1997; 31(2):321-53. PubMed ID: 11660616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic discrimination, insurability and legislation: a closing of the legal loopholes.
Bornstein RA
J Law Policy; 1996; 4(2):551-610. PubMed ID: 11660776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Whose gene is it? A case discussion about familial conflict over genetic testing for breast cancer.
Green RM; Thomas AM
J Genet Couns; 1997 Jun; 6(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 11656643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
