151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657476)
1. Knowing their own minds: psychiatric patients agreeing to clinical trials may not realise what they're letting themselves in for. Can new guidelines protect them without hampering research into crucial new drugs?
Boyce N
New Sci; 1998 Jun; 158(2139):20-1. PubMed ID: 11657476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychiatric researchers under fire.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1998 May; ():F1, F5. PubMed ID: 11648088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The ethics of conducting psychosis-inducing experiments.
Sharav VH
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):137-67. PubMed ID: 11658172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Placebo controls are not good science.
Weijer C; Appelbaum P
IRB; 1996; 18(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 11654741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychiatric guinea pigs are left in limbo.
Boyce N
New Sci; 1998 Nov; 160(2162):21. PubMed ID: 11660595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How can valid informed consent be obtained from a psychotic patient for research into psychosis? Three perspectives.
Freckelton I; Keks N; Howe V; Foister K; Jenkins K; Copolov D; Sullivan D
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):60-75. PubMed ID: 15069966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Attempts at suppressing data.
Shamoo AE; Quist N; Howe EG
Prof Ethics Rep; 1997; 10(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11660483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Drug-free research in schizophrenia: an overview of the controversy.
Appelbaum PS
IRB; 1996; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Placebo: pro and con.
Lapierre YD; Weijer C
NCEHR Commun; 1997-1998 Winter-Spring; 8(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 11660612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parents say that controversial study was not ethically justifiable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Dec; 15(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 11789518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects.
Ryan AJ
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ... (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Nov; 14(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 12194197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consensus on ethics in research is elusive.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1995 Jan; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
Derrickson D
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent.
Barnes PG
ABA J; 1997 Mar; 83():24-7. PubMed ID: 11660466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethics of harmful psychiatric research: a faulty effort to defend them.
Lehrman NS
Account Res; 1997; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 11656994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
