These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657542)
21. 'Genetic engineering'--the manifest hazards. Anderson ES New Sci; 1978 Jul; 79(1110):34-5. PubMed ID: 11663873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. DNA and the congressional prerogatives: proposals for a deliberate legislative approach to genetic research. English TL Indiana Law J; 1978; 53(3):571-84. PubMed ID: 11661591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Making informed decisions for genetic engineering: questions of policy and ethics. Trumble WR; Bohach CH J Idaho Acad Sci; 1992 Dec; 28(2):1-7. PubMed ID: 11654362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. You shall be as gods. Powledge TM Worldview; 1977 Sep; 20(9):45-7. PubMed ID: 11661489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The potential for genetic engineering: a proposal for international legal control. Gardner BJ VA J Int Law; 1976; 16(2):403-29. PubMed ID: 11661343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Recombinant DNA Act--S. 1217. Nelson G Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Aug; 123(132):S13312-9. PubMed ID: 11661670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Americans let loose new genetic types into environment. Joyce C New Sci; 1983 Jun; 98(1364):926. PubMed ID: 11655535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Proposed guidelines for research involving the planned introduction into the environment of organisms with deliberately modified hereditary traits; notice. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Office of the Secretary Fed Regist; 1991 Feb; 56(22):4134-51. PubMed ID: 11656084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Scientists ask Congress to control DNA research. Leeper EM Bioscience; 1977 Feb; 27(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 11661597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The promise and perils of synthetic biology. Tucker JB; Zilinskas RA New Atlantis; 2006; 12():25-45. PubMed ID: 16832953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The recombinant DNA debate. [(Title provided[. McGarity T Univ Kans Law Rev; 1979; 27(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 12083081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Controlling creation: what's at stake in genetic engineering. Bengelsdorf IS Am Med News; 1977 Nov; 20(47):Impact 3-4. PubMed ID: 11661513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Monterey woos biotech firms by relaxing field trial rules. Lehrman S Nature; 1995 Dec 21-28; 378(6559):758. PubMed ID: 11654270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Draft report to annual and central conferences, Dec 1990: an invitation to explore a frontier. United Methodist Church. Genetic Science Task Force Engage Soc Action; 1991 Jan; 4(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 11659313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Tinkering with life. Time; 1977 Apr; 109(16):32-34+. PubMed ID: 11661472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the illogical climax to the animal patenting debate. Bateman R J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):115-41. PubMed ID: 11652309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Engineering the therapies of tomorrow. Coghlan A New Sci; 1993 Apr; 138(1870):26-31. PubMed ID: 11656235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]