These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657587)
1. A collaborative conference on women as research subjects. Dreyfus R IRB; 1998; 20(6):12-3. PubMed ID: 11657587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of human subjects. United States Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The NIH inclusion guidelines: challenges for the future. Rothenberg KH; Hayunga EG; Rudick JE; Pinn VW IRB; 1996; 18(3):1-4, 12. PubMed ID: 11654407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New human subject regulations would change certain IRB reviews. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Jul; 13(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11656820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Exclusion of pregnant women from research protocols: unethical and illegal. Hall JK IRB; 1995; 17(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11653053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new rule for vulnerable research subjects has some special provisions. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jun; 9(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects. Fletcher JC Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protection of human subjects. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Code Fed Regul Public Welfare; 1995 Oct; Title 45(Sections 46-101 to 46-409):. PubMed ID: 11686173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Safeguards questioned: some worry that policies to protect human research subjects may be inadequate. Burd S Chron High Educ; 1994 Feb; 40():30-1. PubMed ID: 11660767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Women in clinical trials: concluding remarks. Buc NL Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 11653146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposed regulations on fetal research--and some reactions! Contemp Ob Gyn; 1975 Nov; 6(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 11664652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective. Bagley G Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women and HIV/AIDS research: the barriers to equity. Levine C IRB; 1991; 13(1-2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11659324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Institute of Medicine's report on women and health research: implications for IRBs and the research community. Rothenberg KH IRB; 1996; 18(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials. Charo RA St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. NIH draft guidelines on human research need revision. Roncallo AD; Hogan LJ Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 Dec; 119(194):H11138-40. PubMed ID: 11664203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation. O'Rourke KD Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects. Ryan AJ J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The future of fetal research in California: a proposal for change. Lehmann PL San Diego Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 15(4):859-86. PubMed ID: 11664975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]