147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657588)
1. Attention to difference and women's consent to research.
Eckenwiler LA
IRB; 1998; 20(6):6-11. PubMed ID: 11657588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Women of childbearing potential in clinical research: perspectives on NIH policy and liability issues.
Hayunga EG; Rothenberg KH; Pinn VW
Food Drug Cosmet Med Device Law Dig; 1996 Jan; 13(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11660302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's and fetal rights and interests: ethical aspects.
Fletcher JC
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 11653145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-cultural ethics in the conduct of deafness research.
Pollard RQ
Rehabil Psychol; 1992; 37(2):87-101. PubMed ID: 11659590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protecting us to death: women, pregnancy, and clinical research trials.
Charo RA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):135-87. PubMed ID: 11656322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-funded research: paying the piper or protecting the patient?
Morreim EH
IRB; 1991; 13(3):1-6. PubMed ID: 11651046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent and the nonautonomous person: the dynamics of dependency relationships.
Dyer AR
IRB; 1982; 4(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research participation as a contract.
Lawson C
Ethics Behav; 1995; 5(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 11660017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.
Tuthill KA
J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pursuing reform in clinical research: lessons from women's experience.
Eckenwiler LA
J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):158-70. PubMed ID: 11657464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Krauss DJ
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
Mertus J; Heller S
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols.
Gorenberg H; White A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Introduction (to 6 articles and a position paper on ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research).
High DM; Post SG; Whitehouse PJ
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):1-4. PubMed ID: 11657669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "There is no evidence to suggest...": changing the way we judge information for disclosure in the informed consent process.
Cannold L
Hypatia; 1997; 12(2):165-84. PubMed ID: 11660600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guinea pigs on the payroll: the ethics of paying research subjects.
Lemmens T; Elliott C
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 11657561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The standard of disclosure in human subject experimentation.
Morin K
J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):157-221. PubMed ID: 9658739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The ethics of deception in biomedical research.
Sharpe G; Weisstub DN
Health Law Can; 1996 May; 16(4):101-10. PubMed ID: 10173418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a right to fetal tissue transplantation?
Morgan GL
Univ Tasman Law Rev; 1991; 10(2):129-56. PubMed ID: 11659574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
