194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657595)
1. Patients' rights and doctors' responsibilities: confluence and conflict.
Jessop DS
Med Law Int; 1998; 3(2-3):197-208. PubMed ID: 11657595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia.
Magnusson R
Melb Univ Law Rev; 1996 Dec; 20(4):1108-42. PubMed ID: 11657522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Decisions and responsibilities at the end of life: euthanasia and clinically assisted death.
Biggs H
Med Law Int; 1996; 2(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 11660677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die: progress and peril.
Capron AM
Euthan Rev; 1987; 2(1 2):41-59. PubMed ID: 11649218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: all systems are not yet "go".
Snider GL
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1995 Feb; 151(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 11654310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Autonomy, life as an intrinsic value, and the right to die in dignity.
Cohen-Almagor R
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995; 1(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 11656648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What are the important ethical issues in chronic dialysis?
Cummings NB; Holley JL; Moss AH; Cassel CK; Lowance DC; Hirsch DJ
Semin Dial; 1990; 3(4):210-8. PubMed ID: 11659351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Terminating treatment in Hungary Allocating death.
Kovacs J; Evans D
Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Oct; No. 72():13-20. PubMed ID: 11659452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Orchestrating a dignified death in the intensive-care unit.
Youngner SJ
Clin Chem; 1990 Aug; 36(8 Part B):1617-22. PubMed ID: 11652733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Futility guidelines: a resource for decisions about withholding and withdrawing treatment.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. VACO [VA Central Office] Bioethics Committee. Subcommittee on Futility (Chairperson: Dorothy Rasinski Gregory)
NCCE News; 1994; 2(3 insert):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care.
Dorff EN
Conserv Jud; 1991; 43(3):3-51. PubMed ID: 11651008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Active euthanasia: can it be justified?
Molenda FA
Euthan Rev; 1988; 3(1):15-43. PubMed ID: 11649265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-step fantastic: the continuing case of Brother Fox.
Ramsey P
Theol Stud; 1981 Mar; 42(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 11658893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny.
Cotler M
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 11651354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The limitations of legislation.
Orentlicher D
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. House of Lords on care for dying.
Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Feb; No. 95():13-6. PubMed ID: 11652723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Appleton International Conference: Developing guidelines for decisions to forgo life-prolonging medical treatment -- Preamble, Parts I, II, III, and IV.
Stanley JM;
J Med Ethics; 1992 Sep; 18(Suppl):S3-22. PubMed ID: 11652619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.
Weber LJ
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):95-102. PubMed ID: 11651037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
