These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Medical treatment: the mother's rights. Bridgeman J Family Law; 1993 Sep; 23():534-5. PubMed ID: 11657220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Colleges say no to forced caesarean sections. Dyer C BMJ; 1994 Jan; 308(6923):224. PubMed ID: 11644510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judge misled over call for caesarean operation. Dyer C BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7131):574. PubMed ID: 11645034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Wide appeal filed on forced Caesarean delivery. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension. Dawson TB Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question. Levine EM Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment without consent (pregnancy): adult -- Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v. C.H. Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 11655136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making. Stanyer BT Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court-ordered caesarian sections: in whose interests? Stern K Mod Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 56(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 11652316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Knowledge, practice, and power: court-ordered cesarean sections. Irwin S; Jordan B Med Anthropol Q; 1987 Sep; 1(3):319-34. PubMed ID: 11659066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend? Michalowski S Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse? Leavine BA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissecting women, dissecting law: the court-ordering of caesarean section operations and the failure of informed consent to protect women of color. Espinoza LG Natl Black Law J; 1994; 13():211-37. PubMed ID: 11660478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting. Sturgess RH Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights? Gallagher J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women. Daniels JA Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means? Drigotas EE North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]