419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657627)
21. Recent developments in the law governing medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1988 May; 22(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11652540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
Cerminara KL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. In the matter of George Clark.
Nimz M
Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
Bennett SA
Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The slippery slope.
Doyle K; Carroll A
New Law J; 1996 May; 146(6745):759-61. PubMed ID: 11657174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Cruzan decision -- a surgeon's perspective.
McNoble DJ
Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1990; 20(4):569-610. PubMed ID: 11652628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Ethical guidelines for treatment of the dying elderly.
Schostak Z
J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1991; No. 22():62-86. PubMed ID: 11659390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. I.V. withdrawal: the severance of medicine's or society's umbilical cord? Barber v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 137 Cal.App.3d 1006, 195 Cal.Rptr. 484 (1983).
Chrisman JP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):941-72. PubMed ID: 11652480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Appointing a proxy under the best of circumstances.
White PD
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 11656534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Supreme Court decision In respect of a Ward of Court.
O'Brien T
J Ir Med Assoc; 1995; 88(6):183, 187. PubMed ID: 11657819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
Strasser M
KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die.
Berman MB
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Hydration and Nutrition for Incompetent Patients Act. Oklahoma Enrolled House Bill No. 1189.
Oklahoma
Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 11644119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Choosing how to die: the need for reform of Oregon's living will legislation.
Carey RL
Willamette Law Rev; 1987; 23(1):69-92. PubMed ID: 11652517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical treatment rights of older persons and persons with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1992 Jan; 25(9):1204-17. PubMed ID: 11659393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar.
Robertson JA
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1243-52. PubMed ID: 11652582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Beyond the living will: making advance directives more useful.
Culver CM; Gert B
Omega (Westport); 1990; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11652562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
