242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657732)
1. Competing interests: the need to control conflict of interests in biomedical research.
Steiner D
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):457-68. PubMed ID: 11657732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts.
Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP
Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. University physician-researcher conflicts of interest: the inadequacy of current controls and proposed reform.
Maatz CT
High Technol Law J; 1992; 7():137-88. PubMed ID: 11659962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.
Friedman PJ
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 11651613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research.
Andrews LB
Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Conflicts of interest.
Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6236):664. PubMed ID: 11644385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How well do university researchers police themselves?: a case at Georgetown raises the question.
Weiser B
Washington Post; 1991 Jan; ():Health Su-13. PubMed ID: 11646786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical issues in funding and monitoring university research.
Beauchamp TL
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1992; 11(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 11659431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment.
Werhane P; Doering J
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):47-81. PubMed ID: 11655040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Federal agency revises rule on financial disclosure by researchers.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Feb; 14(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE).
Martensen R
Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Objectivity in research; final rule.
U.S. Public Health Service
Fed Regist; 1995 Jul; 60(132):35810-9. PubMed ID: 11660080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers.
Heitman E
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4 Suppl):S40-4. PubMed ID: 11658244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. United States: protecting the integrity of research.
Sibbison JB
Lancet; 1989 Nov; 2(8671):1094. PubMed ID: 11644437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Academic interest conflicts: laxity of Californian practice.
Budiansky S
Nature; 1983 Jan; 301(5896):102. PubMed ID: 11643953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In search of funding: the clinical investigator and the drug company; Commentary: why researchers need not be demoralized.
Siris ES; Burrell CD
IRB; 1983; 5(6):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risky alliance on medicine's cutting edge: firm faces business, ethics issues in NIH joint venture.
Lehrman S
Washington Post; 1991 Aug; ():Business 1, 14. PubMed ID: 11646923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]