These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657735)
1. Regulation of xenotransplantation: are we asking the right questions? Fishman JA Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):483-5. PubMed ID: 11657735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Xenografting will never be free of infection risk. Lyons D Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Nov; No. 152():19-23. PubMed ID: 11658082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Xenotransplantation: the ethical and legal ramifications. Fox M; McHale J Med Law Rev; 1998; 6(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 11657225 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Public health concerns take center stage in Nuffield Council on Bioethics: a review of Animal-to-Human Transplants: The Ethics of Xenotransplantation. Allan JS Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):486-90. PubMed ID: 11657736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Draft Report of the Infection Surveillance Steering Group of the UKXIRA: Annex Five: Consent issues arising from requirements for infection surveillance. Great Britain. Xenotransplantation Interim Regulatory Authority. Infection Surveillance Steering Group Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Nov; No. 152():9-11. PubMed ID: 11658085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Human xenotransplantation trials may be licensed in the UK. Mitchell P Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):464. PubMed ID: 11656949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The NIH report of its review of the Baby Fae case. Dommel FW; IRB; 1986; 8(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11649748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby Fae: the ethics of medical adventurism. Preston TA Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11647783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal-to-Human Transplants: The Ethics of Xenotransplantation: a review. Berger AH Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 11657734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transplant of baboon heart conformed to safety rules. Mathews J Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11647786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. This little piggy went to market: the xenotransplantation and xenozoonose debate. Clark MA J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 11657462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Draft Public Health Service Guideline on Infectious Disease Issues in Xenotransplantation (August 1996); notice. U.S. Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1996 Sep; 61(185):49919-32. PubMed ID: 11645324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. UK bioethics council wants stricter controls on xenotransplantation. Ramsay S Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9002):683. PubMed ID: 11654328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. NIH approves the consent for Baby Fae, or does it? Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Apr; 15(2):2. PubMed ID: 11643771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of scrutiny fueled Baby Fae controversy. Russell C Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Baboon-to-human transplants: should we proceed? Arnold RM; Dresser R; Hefner P; Offner SK Mak Rounds Health Faith Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(3):1, 3-4, 8. PubMed ID: 11653222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary: a critique of Clark's frightening xenotransplantion scenario. Vanderpool HY J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 11657463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The using of Baby Fae. Krauthammer C Washington Post; 1984 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]