These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657743)

  • 1. Using Arendt and Heidegger to consider feminist thinking on women and reproductive/infertility technologies.
    Klawiter M
    Hypatia; 1990; 5(3):65-89. PubMed ID: 11657743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hannah Arendt, feminist theorizing, and the debate over new reproductive technologies.
    Curtis KF
    Polity; 1995; 28(2):159-87. PubMed ID: 11655203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A feminist social justice approach to reproduction-assisting technologies: a case study on the limits of liberal theory.
    Callahan JC; Roberts DE
    KY Law J; 1996; 84(4):1197-234. PubMed ID: 15228041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feminism and reproductive technologies.
    Callahan JC
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 11644539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feminist perspectives on reproductive technologies: the politics of motherhood.
    Chokr NN
    Technol Soc; 1992; 14(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 11652187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "O wind, remind him that I have no child": infertility and feminist jurisprudence.
    Lacey LJ
    Mich J Gend Law; 1998-1999; 5(1):163-203. PubMed ID: 16596756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legislative regulation of surrogacy and reproductive technology.
    Shultz MM
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):613-25. PubMed ID: 11655178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The commodification of the body and its parts.
    Sharp LA
    Annu Rev Anthropol; 2000; 29():287-328. PubMed ID: 15977341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the limits of freedom of contract: the commercialization of reproductive materials and services.
    Trebilcock M; Martin M; Lawson A; Lewis P
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1994; 32(4):613-702. PubMed ID: 15846868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Other mothers: toward an ethic of postmaternal practice.
    Michaels MW
    Hypatia; 1996; 11(2):49-70. PubMed ID: 11657130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: a feminist perspective.
    Rothman BK
    Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1599-607. PubMed ID: 11653382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feminist critiques of new fertility technologies: implications for social policy.
    Donchin A
    J Med Philos; 1996 Oct; 21(5):475-98. PubMed ID: 8943088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New reproductive technologies in Canada and the United States: same problems, different discourses.
    Young AH
    Temple Int Comp Law J; 1998; 12(1):43-85. PubMed ID: 11660812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. (Com)modifying experience.
    Altman S
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):293-340. PubMed ID: 11645837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The future of mothering: reproductive technology and feminist theory.
    Donchin A
    Hypatia; 1986; 1(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 12530384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meanings and strategies of reproductive control: current feminist approaches to reproductive technology.
    Vanderwater B
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 11651474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surrogate mothering and the meaning of family.
    Warnke G
    Dissent; 1994; 41(4):466-73. PubMed ID: 11660790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How (not) to think about surrogacy and other reproductive innovations.
    Shapiro MH
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):647-80. PubMed ID: 11655181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mode of reproduction in transition: a Marxist-feminist analysis of the effects of reproductive technologies.
    Gimenez ME
    Gend Soc; 1991 Sep; 5(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 11659503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New Zealand's Approaches to Regulating the Commodification of the Female Body : A Comparative Analysis Reveals Ethical Inconsistencies.
    Otterman LS
    J Bioeth Inq; 2023 Jun; 20(2):315-326. PubMed ID: 37017815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.