306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657769)
1. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: scientific misconduct or necessity?
Jefferson T
Sci Eng Ethics; 1998 Apr; 4(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 11657769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Deceit in science: does it really matter?
Birch AJ
Interdiscip Sci Rev; 1990 Dec; 15(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 11651223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Different lessons from the Darsee affair?
Tynan M; Anderson RH
Int J Cardiol; 1984; 5(11):9-11. PubMed ID: 11653729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An introduction to research ethics.
Friedman PJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Oct; 2(4):443-56. PubMed ID: 11657731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Many journals have not retracted "fraudulent" research.
Cooper-Mahkorn D
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7148):1850. PubMed ID: 11645074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cheating in science and publishing.
Altman LK
CBE Views; 1981; 4(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 11649550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
Kuzma SM
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deception in scientific research.
Woolf PK
Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The exposure of a scientific fraud.
Swan N
New Sci; 1988 Dec; 120(1641):30-1. PubMed ID: 11655909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The persistence of fraud in the literature: the Darsee case.
Kochan CA; Budd JM
J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1992 Aug; 43(7):488-93. PubMed ID: 11653988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Misconduct in science is not rare, a survey finds.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Procedures for Responding to Charges of Unethical Research Practices, Revised March 1985 Report of the Faculty Ad Hoc Committee to Investigate Research Fraud, 30 September 1986.
University of California, San Diego. School of Medicine
Minerva; 1987; 25(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 11650156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lies, damned lies, and science -- BBC2 Horizon: "The Betrayers," 13 Mar 1995.
Wilmshurst P
BMJ; 1995 Mar; 310(6981):747. PubMed ID: 11644676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Research fraud, misconduct, and the IRB.
Hilgartner S
IRB; 1990; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The process of publication.
Koshland DE
Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Science's faulty fraud detectors.
Broad WJ; Wade N
Psychol Today; 1982 Nov; 16(11):51-54, 57. PubMed ID: 11649505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
