228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657783)
1. On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
Edsall JT
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 11657783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
Goldbeck-Wood S
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: "On the hazards of whistleblowers and on some problems of young biomedical scientists in our time.
Krimsky S
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Oct; 1(4):341-4. PubMed ID: 11657784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Science, journalism, and whistle-blowing.
Koshland DE
Science; 1988 Apr; 240(4852):585. PubMed ID: 11644303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Call for research misconduct agency.
White C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Academics face abuse of rules designed to protect research.
Cowen RC
Christ Sci Monitor; 1998 Mar; ():13. PubMed ID: 11647561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson).
Swazey JP
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 11657862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Case studies for teaching research ethics.
Elliott D
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):179-98. PubMed ID: 11655038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for training in the ethical conduct of scientific research.
Garte SJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 11657881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?
Lubalin JS; Matheson JL
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):229-50. PubMed ID: 11657861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Her study shattered the myth that fraud in science is a rarity.
Altman LK
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():C3. PubMed ID: 11647002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The assault on David Baltimore.
Kevles DJ
New Yorker; 1996 May; 72(13):94-98, 100-104, 106-109. PubMed ID: 11654450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson).
Sieber JE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 11657863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Science police.
Dolnick E
Discover; 1994 Feb; 15(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 11653089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Attempts at suppressing data.
Shamoo AE; Quist N; Howe EG
Prof Ethics Rep; 1997; 10(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11660483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Process and detection in fraud and deceit.
Silverman S
Ethics Behav; 1994; 4(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 11652795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
