These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657852)
1. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempts to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston). Dale ML Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 11657852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston). Shipp AC Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11657851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct. Guston DH Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 11657850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct. Francis S Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity. Friedman PJ Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis). Ryan KJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal). Chubin DE Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends. Mishkin B Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 11657867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Office of Scientific Integrity. Hamilton DP Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law. Sise CB San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions. Fox MF; Braxton JM J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary on "Confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?" (N.H. Steneck). Friedman PJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 11657854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities. Wright DE Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Whistleblowing: a very unpleasant avocation. Sprague RL Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):103-33. PubMed ID: 11653080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Too good to be true. Colt GH Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals. Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world. Guston DH Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]