256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657857)
1. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
Chubin DE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis).
Ryan KJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.
Francis S
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.
Mishkin B
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 11657867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
Kline S
J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Office of Scientific Integrity.
Hamilton DP
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
Friedman PJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific reasoning and due process.
Guenin LM; Davis BD
Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct in US health service.
Choo V
Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Star chambers will result in injustice.
Kevles DJ
Nature; 1998 Sep; 395(6700):317. PubMed ID: 11645104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston).
Shipp AC
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11657851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The fraud case that evaporated.
N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempts to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston).
Dale ML
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 11657852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
