190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657865)
1. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis).
Ryan KJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.
Francis S
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal).
Chubin DE
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston).
Shipp AC
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11657851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of federal regulations in assuring research integrity.
Friedman PJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):111-6. PubMed ID: 11652290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct.
Guston DH
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 11657850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Which ethics for science and public policy?
Irving DN; Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):77-100. PubMed ID: 11652298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempts to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston).
Dale ML
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 11657852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects; notice and proposed rules.
U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
Fed Regist; 1988 Nov; 53(218):45660-82. PubMed ID: 11645617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
Fox MF; Braxton JM
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.
Mishkin B
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 11657867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Too good to be true.
Colt GH
Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Commentary on "Confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?" (N.H. Steneck).
Friedman PJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 11657854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?
Steneck NH
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 11657853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A call for the development of "Good Research Practices" (GRP) guidelines.
Glick JL; Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1993; 2(4):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
Lang S
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
LaFollette MC
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Office of Scientific Integrity.
Hamilton DP
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
