221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657868)
1. Development of international guidelines for research ethics: a commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin).
Kaiser M
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 11657868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin).
Parrish DM
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):299-301. PubMed ID: 11657869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.
Mishkin B
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 11657867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical research and treatment: ethical standards in the international context.
Vennell MA
Med Law Int; 1995; 2(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11653224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects; notice and proposed rules.
U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
Fed Regist; 1988 Nov; 53(218):45660-82. PubMed ID: 11645617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rise of research ethics committees in Western Europe: some concomitant problems.
Bergkamp L
Bioethics; 1989 Apr; 3(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 11649242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research ethics exists beyond Helsinki.
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Aug; No. 150():3-5. PubMed ID: 11657792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research ethics in Eastern Europe.
Szawarski Z
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Oct; No. 82():13-8. PubMed ID: 11651511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Trends in gene therapy regulation.
Lecomte V; Taylor A
Gene Ther; 1997 Feb; 4(2):77-8. PubMed ID: 11644906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical assessments within legislative systems.
Hampson J
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):161-8. PubMed ID: 11649996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene trial causes ethical storm in New Zealand.
Coney S
Lancet; 1996 Jun; 347(9017):1759. PubMed ID: 11654364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unmanaged care: the need to regulate new reproductive technologies in the United States.
Cohen CB
Bioethics; 1997; 11(3-4):348-65. PubMed ID: 11654790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed model federal policy for protection of human subjects; response to the First Biennial Report of the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy
Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(106):20204-17. PubMed ID: 11658721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulating research: a tale of two technologies.
Zallen DT
Technol Soc; 1989; 11(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 11651309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America.
McNeill PM
IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare.
Bergkamp L
IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In response: speaking truth to historiography.
Faden R; Guttman D
Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 11645854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. If only it were so: medical physics, U.S. human radiation experiments, and the Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee (ACHRE).
Martensen R
Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):21-36. PubMed ID: 11645853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis).
Ryan KJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Commentary on "Confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?" (N.H. Steneck).
Friedman PJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 11657854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
