These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657926)

  • 21. Patients v. patents?: policy implications of recent patent legislation.
    Katopis CJ
    St Johns Law Rev; 1997; 71():329-401. PubMed ID: 11658166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Innocuous inoculum or perilous parasite? Encouraging genetic research through patent grants: a call for regulation and debate.
    Brashear JF
    San Diego Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 18(2):263-99. PubMed ID: 11650644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genetics research and the judicial decisions.
    Chakrabarty AM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(65):99-102. PubMed ID: 15505918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patent protection of diagnostic technology: will recent US Supreme Court decisions change patent strategy?
    Komatani TS
    Pharm Pat Anal; 2015; 4(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 26451906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Why is this surgeon suing?
    Chartrand S
    N Y Times Web; 1995 Jun; ():D1, D5. PubMed ID: 11647083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biotechnology and the commercial use of human cells: toward an organic view of life and technology.
    Martin PA; Lagod ML
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1989 Jun; 5(2):211-61. PubMed ID: 11659674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Supreme Court nullifies patent ruling on living organisms.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1978 Jul; 274(5666):2-3. PubMed ID: 351421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are living organisms proper subject matter for a patent? United States Supreme Court to decide question of first impression in Parker v. Bergy.
    Slade RJ; Van den Broder JM
    West State Univ Law Rev; 1979; 7(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 11662797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New life in US patents: the Chakrabarty case.
    Daus DG
    Eur Intellect Prop Rev; 1981 Jul; 3(7):194-200. PubMed ID: 11650711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patents, patients, and public policy: an incomplete intersection at 35 U.S.C. Section 287(c).
    Ho CM
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 2000; 33(3):601-75. PubMed ID: 16389678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patenting life.
    Kass LR
    Commentary; 1981 Dec; 72(6):45-57. PubMed ID: 11649383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Toward a general theory of constitutional personhood: a theory of constitutional personhood for transgenic humanoid species.
    Rivard MD
    UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 39(5):1425-510. PubMed ID: 11652110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. US courts narrow patent exemptions.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):834. PubMed ID: 12894182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patents showdown.
    Emmott S
    Splice Life; 1998; 4(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11657658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethics and the directive for the legal protection of biotechnological inventions.
    Scott-Ram N
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Jan; No. 124():25-8. PubMed ID: 11655055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On access and accountability--two Supreme Court rulings on generic drugs.
    Boumil MM; Curfman GD
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(8):696-7. PubMed ID: 23923990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Landmark legal cases in bioethics.
    Poland SC
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1997 Jun; 7(2):191-209. PubMed ID: 11654991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The regulation of biotechnology in Canada: social and moral issues.
    Gorenstein H
    Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 11657550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Owning the secret of life: biotechnology and property rights revisited.
    Yelpaala K
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):111-219. PubMed ID: 15709267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Push for royalties threatens use of Down syndrome test.
    Eichenwald K
    N Y Times Web; 1997 May; ():A1, D3. PubMed ID: 11647510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.