These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11657936)

  • 1. It's business as usual: legal loopholes could undermine Britain's attempts to keep cloning research on hold.
    Coghlan A
    New Sci; 1999 Jul; 162(2193):4. PubMed ID: 11657936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Great expectations.
    Coghlan A; Young E
    New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2272):9. PubMed ID: 15366156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Business as usual.
    Nature; 1990 May; 345(6271):98. PubMed ID: 11642766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stem cell studies advance in Britain.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12155135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human clones split fertility experts.
    Miller SK; Vines G
    New Sci; 1993 Oct; 140(1897):7. PubMed ID: 11659681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loophole legalizes human cloning.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6862):381. PubMed ID: 11719761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New rules on use of human embryos in cell research.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2000 Aug; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11785518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thrash it out.
    New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2272):3. PubMed ID: 15366155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics of cloning: who decides?
    Weiss R
    Washington Post; 1993 Nov; ():Health, 12-13, 15. PubMed ID: 11647945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. International stem cell use and regulation in research.
    Lin L
    J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 16538804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far?
    Cannon J; Haas M
    Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientists react to government indecision.
    Brown P
    Nat Med; 1999 Aug; 5(8):855-6. PubMed ID: 10426295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facing facts.
    New Sci; 2001 Aug; 171(2304):3. PubMed ID: 11838482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stem cell research, in Parliament.
    Bull Med Ethics; 2000 Dec-2001 Jan; (164):18-22. PubMed ID: 11831256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond the HFE Act of 1990: the regulation of stem cell research in the UK.
    Plomer A
    Med Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):132-64. PubMed ID: 14982080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates.
    Daley GQ
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Moratoriums on embryo research.
    Campbell CS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(3):2. PubMed ID: 11650795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Australia stops short of a ban on therapeutic cloning.
    Nowak R
    New Sci; 2001 Sep; 171(2310):11. PubMed ID: 11838486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.