These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658005)

  • 1. Genetic testing for cancer risk: a population survey on attitudes and intention.
    Ulrich CM; Kristal AR; White E; Hunt JR; Durfy SJ; Potter JD
    Community Genet; 1998; 1(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 11658005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer risk among Washington State residents.
    Ulrich CM; Kristal AR; Durfy SJ; Hunt JR; White E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1996 Oct; 59(4):A340. PubMed ID: 11644835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a model informed consent process for BRCA1 testing: a qualitative assessment of women's attitudes.
    Bernhardt BA; Geller G; Strauss M; Helzlsouer KJ; Stefanek M; Wilcox PM; Holtzman NA
    J Genet Couns; 1997 Jun; 6(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 11656642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. States pass laws to regulate uses of genetic testing.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Oct; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11648071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic information: consumers' right to privacy versus insurance companies' right to know: a public opinion survey.
    Borna S; Avila S
    J Bus Ethics; 1999 May; 19(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 11660747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accessing genomic information or safeguarding genetic privacy.
    Smith GP
    J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 11654453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whom would you trust with your genetic information?
    Weiss JO; Kozma C; Lapham EV
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Oct; 61(4):A24. PubMed ID: 11644968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting genetic difference.
    Yesley MS
    Berkeley Technol Law J; 1998; 13(2):653-65. PubMed ID: 11979598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene tests survey: results.
    Brunner E
    Splice Life; 1996 Dec; 3(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic screening for breast cancer susceptibility: a Torah perspective.
    Mosenkis A
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1997; No. 34():5-26. PubMed ID: 11660426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical aspects of genetic testing.
    Fruchtman CE; Pizzulli FC
    Whittier Law Rev; 1998; 20(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 11660804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic privacy in Washington state: policy considerations and a Model Genetic Privacy Act.
    Jensen KA
    Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):357-86. PubMed ID: 11660670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agenda.
    Davison C; Macintyre S; Smith GD
    Sociol Health Illn; 1994 Jun; 16(3):340-71. PubMed ID: 11660089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advent of testing for breast cancer genes leads to fears of disclosure and discrimination.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Feb; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11647194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic fallout: new technologies are changing the legal landscape.
    Andrews LB
    Trial; 1995 Dec; 31(12):20-23, 25-27. PubMed ID: 11660434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic testing falls short of public embrace.
    Kolata G
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic discrimination in employment and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    Rothstein MA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):23-84. PubMed ID: 11656667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
    Stepanuk NA
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Insurance underwriting in the genetic era.
    Pokorski RJ
    Cancer; 1997 Aug; 80(3 Suppl):587-99. PubMed ID: 11660561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Participation in pedigree studies and the risk of impeded access to health insurance.
    Kass NE
    IRB; 1993; 15(5):7-10. PubMed ID: 11659704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.