136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658021)
1. Doctor knows best? Therapeutic detention under common law, the Mental Health Act, and the European Convention.
Fennell P
Med Law Rev; 1998; 6(3):322-53. PubMed ID: 11658021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The third way in mental health policy: negative rights, positive rights, and the Convention.
Fennell P
J Law Soc; 1999 Mar; 26(1):103-27. PubMed ID: 11660777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. R v. Canons Park Mental Health Review Tribunal, ex parte A.
Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division
All Engl Law Rep; 1993 Jul; [1994] 1():481-94. PubMed ID: 11648636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patients' rights legislation in Lithuania.
Birmontiene T
Eur J Health Law; 1996 Mar; 3(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 11654850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When can a patient sue for negligence and wrongful detention under the Mental Health Act?
Brahams D
Lancet; 1985 Oct; 2(8458):789-90. PubMed ID: 11644489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patients' rights: commitment of minors to mental institutions.
McCorry M
Annu Surv Am Law; 1978; 1978(4):653-78. PubMed ID: 11651849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Civil rights groups attack psychiatric care.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Jun; 306(6892):1562-3. PubMed ID: 11643140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental Health Act 1983 review: draft proposals.
Great Britain. Department of Health. Scoping Study Committee
Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Jul; No. 149():13-6. PubMed ID: 11657799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Liberty: human rights and mental health.
Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers
Common Law World Rev; 2002; 31(2):107-22. PubMed ID: 15973805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Mental Health Act 1983.
Hoggett B
Public Law; 1983; ():172-90. PubMed ID: 11658503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: compelling arguments for reform.
Price DP
Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(3):321-52. PubMed ID: 11657030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion and international law: the status and possible extension of women's right to privacy.
Michel AE
J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):241-61. PubMed ID: 11655655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Civil commitment: a multi-disciplinary analysis.
Bridge C; Bridge G
Law Rev; 1984 May; 14(2):145-57. PubMed ID: 11658815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to refuse treatment: Commonwealth developments and issues.
Gordon R; Verdun-Jones SN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6():57-73. PubMed ID: 11658523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. International human rights norms and Soviet abuse of psychiatry.
Young-Anawaty A
Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1978; 10(3):785-816. PubMed ID: 11664958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Who are you to say what my best interest is?" Minors' due process rights when admitted by parents for inpatient mental health treatment.
Schmidt K
Wash Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 71(4):1187-217. PubMed ID: 11660505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limitations on reproductive autonomy for the mentally handicapped.
Smith GP
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():71-89. PubMed ID: 11645615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Patients' rights to access their medical records: an argument for uniform recognition of a right of access in the United States and Australia.
Rosenman H
Fordham Int Law J; 1998 Apr; 21(4):1500-57. PubMed ID: 11658076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The never-never land of mental health law: a review of the legal rights of youth committed by their parents to psychiatric facilities in California.
Hollar SS
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1989-1990; 4(2):300-15. PubMed ID: 11659276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
