163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658032)
1. A review of patient outcomes in pharmacological studies from the psychiatric literature, 1966-1993.
Shamoo AE; Irving DN; Langenberg P
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Oct; 3(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 11658032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical ethics in the dock.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Placebo controls are not good science.
Weijer C; Appelbaum P
IRB; 1996; 18(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 11654741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ethics of harmful psychiatric research: a faulty effort to defend them.
Lehrman NS
Account Res; 1997; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 11656994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Agency faults a U.C.L.A. study for suffering of mental patients.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical concerns about relapse studies.
Shamoo AE; Keay TJ
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 8862824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How can valid informed consent be obtained from a psychotic patient for research into psychosis? Three perspectives.
Freckelton I; Keks N; Howe V; Foister K; Jenkins K; Copolov D; Sullivan D
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):60-75. PubMed ID: 15069966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to tell if the men in white coats are lying to you (investigative journalism and research abuse).
Willwerth J
Account Res; 1997; 5(1-3):51-8. PubMed ID: 11654815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US researchers fail to get informed consent.
Roberts J
BMJ; 1994 Mar; 308(6931):739. PubMed ID: 11644521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Knowing their own minds: psychiatric patients agreeing to clinical trials may not realise what they're letting themselves in for. Can new guidelines protect them without hampering research into crucial new drugs?
Boyce N
New Sci; 1998 Jun; 158(2139):20-1. PubMed ID: 11657476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Parents say that controversial study was not ethically justifiable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Dec; 15(12):6-7. PubMed ID: 11789518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical ethical issues and conflicts.
Lazarus J
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 11653309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Relatives of subjects claim that researcher indifference led to harm.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Nov; 15(11):5-6. PubMed ID: 11767805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Consensus on ethics in research is elusive.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1995 Jan; ():24. PubMed ID: 11647995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Drug-free research in schizophrenia: an overview of the controversy.
Appelbaum PS
IRB; 1996; 18(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):241-51. PubMed ID: 11654519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics of research design.
Moreno JD
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):175-82. PubMed ID: 11658174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. True protection for persons with severe mental disabilities, such as schizophrenia, involved as subjects in research? A look and consideration of the "Protection of Human Subjects.
Ryan AJ
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(2):349-76. PubMed ID: 11657417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychiatric researchers under fire.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1998 May; ():F1, F5. PubMed ID: 11648088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
