These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658037)
1. State law on human research did not protect subjects' rights: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part I). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11658037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court says state agency avoided usual way of reporting problems with human subjects: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part II). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New York State laws on protection of human subjects versus federal regulations: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part III). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health. New York. Supreme Court, New York County N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1995 Feb; 626():1015-24. PubMed ID: 12041120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent. Barnes PG ABA J; 1997 Mar; 83():24-7. PubMed ID: 11660466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health. New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1996 Dec; 650():173-94. PubMed ID: 12041119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent for research is related to basic legal rights of all individuals. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Mar; 15(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychosurgery and the involuntarily confined. Kopesky JP Villanova Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 24(5-6):949-91. PubMed ID: 11665098 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Civil rights--a mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs: a constitutional right needing protection. Lafferty M; Lawrence WJ; Lusvardi AA Notre Dame Lawyer; 1981 Dec; 57(2):406-19. PubMed ID: 11658500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research. Schaefer GF Forum; 1981; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The ethics of conducting research with older psychiatric patients. Fitten LJ Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1993 Jan; 8(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11659717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail. Brakel SJ N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject. Bein PM Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum. Wilson JP Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]