These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658054)

  • 1. UK declaration made on research misconduct.
    Horton R
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1623. PubMed ID: 11658054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's new in research ethics.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; No. 122():13-8. PubMed ID: 11654863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Voluntary controls placed on embryo research.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1440):21. PubMed ID: 11655678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The secret world of animal experiments.
    Hampson J
    New Sci; 1992 Apr; 134(1816):24-7. PubMed ID: 11656118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical assessments within legislative systems.
    Hampson J
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):161-8. PubMed ID: 11649996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plans for tackling research fraud may not go far enough.
    White C
    BMJ; 2000 Dec; 321(7275):1487. PubMed ID: 11118165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
    Verma BL; Shukla GD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In response: speaking truth to historiography.
    Faden R; Guttman D
    Med Humanit Rev; 1997; 11(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 11645854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulation of animal experimentation: United States of America.
    Orlans FB
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):138-52. PubMed ID: 11649993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The courage to ask hard questions.
    New Sci; 1995 Oct; 148(1999):3. PubMed ID: 11656492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. British cast spotlight on misconduct in scientific research.
    Altman LK
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jun; ():F3. PubMed ID: 11647563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
    United States
    US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fraud inquiries.
    Campbell PN; Taverne J
    Nature; 1993 Feb; 361(6414):676. PubMed ID: 11643098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. British editors form misconduct panel.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper.
    Fackelmann KA
    Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions.
    Fox MF; Braxton JM
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific research must have a moral basis.
    Warnock M
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1430):36. PubMed ID: 11658551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Too good to be true.
    Colt GH
    Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.