302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658062)
1. State regulations on protecting mentally disabled research subjects are ruled invalid.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Oct; 14(10):4-5. PubMed ID: 11658062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal and ethical concepts involved in informed consent to human research.
Woody KJ
Calif West Law Rev; 1981; 18(1):50-79. PubMed ID: 11658328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The ethics of conducting research with older psychiatric patients.
Fitten LJ
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1993 Jan; 8(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11659717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond Nuremberg: fifty years later, the debate continues on informed consent.
Barnes PG
ABA J; 1997 Mar; 83():24-7. PubMed ID: 11660466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Surrogate consent and the incompetent experimental subject.
Bein PM
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1991 Sep; 46(5):739-71. PubMed ID: 11651381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State law on human research did not protect subjects' rights: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part I).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan; 15(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 11658037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law No. 88-1138 of 20 Dec 1988 on the Protection of Persons Participating in Biomedical Research.
France
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11659174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent.
Haimowitz S; Delano SJ; Oldham JM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):9-16. PubMed ID: 9474489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The new Dutch 'medical experimentation bill' and incompetent patients.
Cusveller BS; Jochemsen H
Ethics Med; 1993; 9(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 11652740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research.
Schaefer GF
Forum; 1981; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court says state agency avoided usual way of reporting problems with human subjects: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part II).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Handicapped persons as research subjects.
Bersoff DN
Amicus; 1979; 4(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 11663096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health.
New York. Supreme Court, New York County
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1995 Feb; 626():1015-24. PubMed ID: 12041120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New York State laws on protection of human subjects versus federal regulations: T.D. v. New York State Office of Mental Health (Part III).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Dec; 14(12):7-8. PubMed ID: 11660760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research on the decisionally impaired: overview and commentary.
Ayd FJ
Med Moral Newsl; 1998; 35(1-2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11660518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
DeRenzo EG
IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research regulations on subjects' "capacity to give consent" were unconstitutional.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can a court order participation in research?
Holder AR
IRB; 1987; 9(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 11649949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
